Is it wrong to eat a second dinner after the first one was unsatisfactory?

If you’re a hungry person, then you have probably done this before. Maybe you go out to dinner with your friend, and it’s one of those places with small portions and light food. Could you be blamed if, a little bit later, you stopped in a slice shop to make sure that you were fed for the day? No! But what if you were eating at your friend’s house, like what happened in this story, which was shared on the AITAH subreddit. When someone is kind enough to host you at their house for dinner, you should probably eat what they serve you. It’s a gesture of politeness. If you’re not allergic to it or don’t morally object to it, you should be open to eating whatever the host has put in front of you. It’s just good manners. But that doesn’t mean you don’t get to eat afterwards. You don’t have to go to bed hungry just because your host for the evening didn’t serve something filling. And if you’re the host, it’s your duty to provide things that you know people will like. You can experiment, sure, but it’s a good idea to have some safe backup options, or at least a few choices. That way, you know that you’re satisfying your guests’ hunger, and you don’t have to worry about them skipping out for pizza after they’re gone.